![]() Meiwess lawyer admitted his client had a fetish for human flesh, but claimed he was no danger to society. Ermel added, “He was always just doing as he was told by other people. It said the video proved that Meiwes killed his victim for his own sexual pleasure. Meiwes had just been a “fulfiller of wishes”. Prosecutor Lothar Senge said killing for sexual gratification was “as morally low as one can go” and therefore murder.ĭefence lawyer Harald Ermel said the victim’s human rights had not been breached because “he renounced them”. ![]() With a video camera running, Meiwes slaughtered him in a decaying manor house in the small town of Rotenburg in March 2001. The evidence showed Meiwes, who admitted to fantasies since he was a child about eating people, made contact via the internet with a Berlin man excited by the idea of being eaten. The appeals court only heard legal arguments, not new evidence, but both sides called for a re-trial in a lower-level court. Prosecutors complained that Meiwes should have been convicted of murder, while a Meiwes lawyer said the introverted computer programmer should receive a lighter sentence. The Federal High Court in Karlsruhe is to issue a verdict 22 April after a day of hearing both sides. KARLSRUHE – Armin Meiwes, 43, the German cannibal serving an eight-and-a-half-year term for manslaughter, was “just doing as he was told” when he chopped up an acquaintance and ate him, a defence lawyer insisted on Wednesday to an appeals court.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |